Scipio

News items on the "global food crisis" are a little thin at the moment: the media is having an orgasm over Obama and the US Presidential elections so they have taken a break from serious reporting. Nevertheless, all the important articles which I have read predict that hungry times are ahead due to a series of factors - rising Third World population levels, the rise of meat eating in India and China, the use of food for biofuels and speculation. Bulk US food retailers are rationing rice and that's just the start.

Although we at this blog would like to see an in-gathering of our folk in a new homeland in Russia, first we need to survive long enough to get up the momentum for change. That requires short-term survivalist measures. Don't panic but slowly stock up on long-life food items and put these items in vermin proof containers (powered milk, packages of dried beans, lentils, flour etc.) Get a vegetable garden going if you can. You may in time, experience the joy of having a full belly while your enemies starve.

The world is likely to face a population of over 9 billion by 2050 - assuming that an ecological/economic crash does not occur before then, eliminating the great bulk of people. China and India have expanding middle classes who are demanding the Western way of life. If every Chinese and Indian had our consumption level the world would be short of most food resources, water, oil, you name it. But the non-White world is expanding in numbers and environmental impact. The result is certain disaster. Even if technology by some miracle puts off the evil day of mass starvation the same crisis will arise again, as human numbers increase. After all the world population in 1950 was only 2.5 billion.

The liberal, pinko and white racial traitor can help the cause of their Third World brothers and sisters. Face your liberal guilt! Give up your resources, job, home, clothes, food, wife/husband, to more worthy migrants. Help pay off the debt of racial guilt! Your sacrifice will be appreciated by everybody. Especially by us.

Unions are concerned about Rudd's anti-Australian policy to raise immigration levels to record highs because a flood of cheap labour would drive down wages. The capitalists sit back and puff out their fat guts and say that foreign workers will do the jobs that Australians won't take. They are a lying bunch of bastards: what type of job is there that an Aussie is not doing? The skills shortage is never empirically substantiated and is just bullshit in my opinion. The capitalist scum advocate "the free market" everywhere else - well why not with these Jobs? Pay workers decent wages and people here will fill any vacancies. This capitalist argument is a "big lie" used across the world to create a reserve army of the unemployed and to ultimately drag down the wages of Australian workers to Third World levels. Resist it!

Britain is being abolished, first by the shock troops of immigration. Thus one in four people now living in Lincolnshire, for example are from Eastern Europe. Of course there are "new patterns of racial prejudice" and the oppressive authorities will be moving to stamp on any sparks of resistance. Britain is also set to be abolished by the EU. There are plans to eliminate Britain as a nation and replace it with three administrative regions ruled from Brussels. The globopsychopaths have been let loose to rule the Continent.

Hey champions of immigration - here is a headline for you: "Rampaging Youth Gangs Slaughter Migrants in Johannesburg" (The Australian, 20 May 2008, p. 8). Twelve murders and 50 people in hospital as the result of "xenophobic attacks" as President Thabo Mbeki described them. Mobs carrying machetes have targeted foreigners. The mobs are black South Africans and the foreigners are from Zimbabwe and local blacks blame the newcomers for crime and unemployment. While the head of the African National Congress has said "We cannot allow South Africa to be famous for xenophobia" gangs of up to 300 youths have been murdered - sometimes by burning people to death. Yet the elites do not seem to see that it is immigration into areas where people are crippled with poverty that is the real cause of this misery, not "xenophobia".

Rudd in the budget has now set permanent and temporary immigration for 2008-2009 at 300,000 a year. This is the highest that this country has seen since the madness of the 1940's when Fabian socialist Labairite Arthur Calwell began his programme to demographically decimate Anglo-Australia.
Looking to papers like The Australian we see articles who's titles say it all: Robert Leeson, "Bring in the Chinese", The Australian, 14/5/08, p. 26 where imported Chinese labour will fill "our infrastructure bottleneck", Dennis Shanahan, "Migrants the ALP Isn't Game to Crow About", The Australian, 16/5/08 p. 12 "An Increase in already high migration will meet the skills shortage and keep a lid on wages"; Paul Howes, "Unions must stop opposing Migrant Labour Schemes", The Australian, 2/5/08, p. 12; Paul Maley, "Call for Low-Skilled Migrants", The Australian, 19/3/08, p. 7; E. Hannan, "One-Off Jump in Migration", The Australian, 14/5/08.
My favourite title though is Paul Kelly "Open Door", (The WE Australian, 17-18 /5/08, p. 19). You can read all of these articles if you wish but the headlines say it all. Rudd is well on the way to creating an open door immigration policy which will transform Australia into an Asian colony.
One in two Australians who live in high migration areas believe that the intake is too high (The Australian, 22/4/08, p. 2). It is time for another anti-immigration party, more hard-hitting that Australians Against Further Immigration. Let's get off our arses and start organising!

The Philippines President, Gloria Arroya is facing a political crisis caused by the world food crisis. The President faces pressure to break from the Catholic Church with its teachings against birth control and population regulation.
The Catholic Church has these policies because that want Catholic bums on seats. Its a business strategy. It is a pity blonde and red-headed Nordics did not follow this policy centuries ago, rather than pursuing the racially - suicidal paths of individualism and "women's rights",
Christianity is a foreign virus that does not serve the interests of our racial survival. It is a form of capitalist-globalism and flowered even before the preset age of economic globalisation. Our people rose to greatness in spite of it, not because of it. Now it is one more oppressive force which our people must unload. Science, and especially ecology, shows that we are merely complex social animals - not beings made in the image of "God", whatever that means.

America is now going down the South African path, as are all Western nations. Immigration, multiracialism, multiculturalism and anti-White ideologies now are the dominant systems-philosophies.
In South Africa violence is now beyond black against white and pogroms against (black) illegal immigrants are occurring. Ethnic and tribal violence threatens to finish off the Mandela dream of a rainbow nation. Even the left are worried (eg J. Steinberg, " End of the Rainbow" Guardian Weekly, 29.10.08, p. 25).
Welcome to life at the end of civilisation. South Africa is an image of the steamy, violent "Bladerunner" future awaiting us.

India and China are both sabre-rattling by entering a space race. India has launched an unmanned moon mission ("India Mission Linked to Lunar Land Grab", Guardian Weekly, 24.10.08 p. 4). The aim of India is to harvest the moon, getting helium 3 for nuclear fusion. China also wants to harvest the moon. So, get ready for a real "star wars" when these Asian powers square off for the control of the universe.

It was instructive to see the so-called conservative General Colin Powell, a black, come out in support of Hussein Obama, a black. And Oprah supported a political candidate for the first time, publicly. All back, of course.
According to the catechisms of political correctness it is fine for black to think racially and support others blacks. But if whites do this - why that is racist: logically this is absurd, contradictory. Yet this is the ruling ideology of the day.

The media across the world went into overdrive to construct and then plant Barack Hussein Obama into the Black House, as America's first multiracial, Muslim president.
Politically correct rock starts like Bruce Springsteen, and talk show host Oprah, elevated Hussein to rock star status.
This is a man, who from his own books is obsessed with himself and his own multiracialism. Brought up to be a socialist by his grandparents, he has felt that he was special.
Ironically his grandmother died on the eve of his election to the presidency. The media didn't get this one in, but they got great shots of Hussein Obama crying.
The Obama phenomenon shows the power of the media, which now rule as securely as any dictator. Never have the masses been so manipulated, or so stupid. How they will squeal as their standard of living tumbles in the times to come. The left can rejoice as they starve to death.
Stockpile food and medical supplies, especially if you are old and have a condition e.g eye drops, blood pressure medicine, antibiotics etc. Think survivalism now.

The best "hope" for the White race lies in global economic collapse. The good years since World War II of affluence have merely led to the survival of the fattest, not the fittest!
Affluence and a ready supply of consumer goods have made the masses soft and altruistic, accepting of the culture of the Left and of people like Don Dunstan and Hussein Obama.
Hopefully a depression worse than any that the world has seen will kill off globalism, leftism, multiculturalism, feminism. Hopefully peak oil is true. Yes, I even hope that global warming is occurring - if not, then global cooling and a new ice age will do fine. Bring it on!
Business-as-usual means that our race dies the death of a thousand cuts. What is needed is a discontinuity, a crisis, something to breakup the inevitability of the funeral march of modernity. To hell with the economy! All that matters now is that our race survives.

In these times of crisis, possibly at the end of civilised order, it is important to discard the myths which have weighed our race down, like lead weights around our feet. Liberalism, egalitarianism and democracy are some such myths: harmless or seemingly so in homogenous societies, but ultimately deadly when the elites sell out the people and bring in the aliens. Then the system is turned against the people who are fast dispossessed. The majority becomes a minority and "democracy" is used against them. Fancy Citizens Initiated Referendum in an Australia where the Chinese dominate population numbers? Well that future is just around the corner.

Human beings are hard-wired for hierarchy: the elites know this and rule because of this. Democracy then has always been a sham. "Democracy" gave us Dunstan in his pink hot pants, Whitlam, Fraser, Hawke, Keating, Howard and now Rudd. Judge a system by its fruits: any system which puts these guys at the top has just got to be wrong. And in the U.S. it is likely to deliver Obama as president. The "people" really do have a death wish.

Mass immigration has destroyed British national pride, according to P.M. Gordon Brown's key advisor on citizenship Lord Goldsmith. One in 10 people now reject British identity. This is a country which now lets in 7,000 immigrants a day. (The Weekly Telegraph, March 26-April 1, 2008, p.7.). And for what? The House of Lords economic Affairs Committee has found that migrant's contribution to the nation's prosperity was negligible. Their G.D.P. was simply swallowed up by their consumption. (The Guardian Weekly, April 11, 2008, p.16). But Gordon Brown wants an endless stream of migrants to flood into Britain. What he wants is the destruction of Britain as we know it.

Writers at this site have been inspired by English farmers who have left England and bought land in Russia for farming. Russia has plenty of land and water but needs people, money and capital. The black earth of Russia is cheap and highly productive - before communism it was the breadbasket of Europe. Writers at this site has suggested that here would be a good chance for racially minded whites - Aryans - to leave their present societies which have become sewers and start again. No more feminism, multicuturalism, multiracialism etc.etc. Let the Chinese finish off Australia - minus us!

By the day the global food crisis gets worse. I personally don't care if people in the "developing world'" starve: I care only about my tribe. And our poor could face hunger. Food rationing has already occurred in America and Britain. So get ready. All the more reason the longer term prospect of building a new society. That would be the ultimate form of survivalism because it directly put the "rude finger' up to globalists.

Here is the telling headline from The Weekly Telegraph, (January, 22-29, 2008): "Bullied Gay Soldier Could Win 400,000 (pounds sterling) Settlement". A lesbian soldier in the British Army was told by a sergesnt that he could "turn her straight". The lesbian soldier won a claim of sexual discrimination/orientation and is now seeking compensation. And, yes, a possible 40,000 (pounds sterling) for "hurt feelings". Once upon a time such stories would have been laughed off as too implausible to be real. But today these sort of stories are scattered in newspapers. So you really think our culture and nation can be "saved".

I'm not a lawyer; in fact I am afraid of the power of lawyers to usurp the power of parliament. In the U.S., the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that American courts are not bound by direct orders from the president. Applied to Australia we should reject any charter of rights for this very reason. Janet Albrechtsen "Beware the Galloping Imperialist Judiciary", (The Australian, April, 13, 2008, p.14) has it right when she says that this class of new class elites distrusts the Australian people. They have a social agenda that they want to see imposed upon us.

Worse, human rights are as numerous as diseases and as controversial. Human rights are not universal timeless truths. Lawyers know this. Human rights means more litigation and more litigation means more money. Money, above all else, is what lawyers love. Like pigs in the mud and ducks in water. A bill of rights will mean a bigger shift in power from parliament to lawyers. We have enough problems with politicians: the rule of lawyers will be a tyranny most terrible.

Environmentalists have it - and they may be right - that South Australia is going down the gurgler. The driest state in the driest continent on Earth faces a major water crisis as the River Murray dies. But the South Australian government and the "greed is good" big business lobby want to double S.A.'s population by migration as soon as possible. Looked at scientifically this is an insane policy. But such is the way of the philosophy of money and capitalism. Our side of politics fears criticising capitalism because they are shit-scared of anything smacking of "collectivism". Hence any vision of the tribe, the race - that which is bigger than the individual - goes out the window. This is nonsense built on stilts. Capitalism today is the real threat to all that is worthwhile. In its natural globalised form it is destroying communities and environments across the world.

The Rudd government is attempting to build bridges with Islamic communities because of angst in the judiciary over the Howard government's terrorism laws. The legal community has "widespread reluctance" to support the legitimacy of the counter-terror laws. There was a political war between the Howard government and the judiciary over this, but under Rudd, it looks like the judiciary has won.

One of the severe flaws in our system of government and law, is the common law system, which is effectively a rule by lawyers. Courts under the disguise of interpreting the law, make a vast body of law. This is known as case law. Where there is silence about the law in a statute (made by parliament), the courts fill it in. The High Court even decides the meaning of the Constitution. As far as I can see, nothing in the Constitution gives them this power (my opinion, all lawyers of course disagree.)

The failure to support terror laws, any laws restraining immigration/illegal aliens, is a common failure of the rule of lawyers across the West. We have a big problem here, so deep I believe that it cannot be solved within our existing system. If we can build a new Nordic society somewhere in Russia, let us not make the mistake of giving so much power to lawyers.

The mighty Hereward has forwarded to me the article "Fun, Fearless, Female : The Role Model Morph," The Advertiser March 1st 2008, for comment. It's the standard text: our young females don't have homemakers as role models, but instead follow power players such as Hillary Clinton. And what a role model to follow! Just go to google and type in "Clinton Bodies" and enjoy. People like Hillary are said to represent "their vision". What a vision!

Children have been put second or third on the list after; career, career, career. I say; enjoy it while it lasts. Beyond anything else, this selfish pursuit of career and infertility will doom us. Radical Islam will win by outbreeding us. Then kiss women's rights goodbye.

Oh, I've heard it before. I have to work to pay off the house, the car, give my pet child a good education. This is the apologies from women who have at least had children. But generation Y seem to not want to breed at all. They are the ultimate pawns of capitalism. But in the coming ecological and economic apocalypse, they too will disappear. Their existence completely depends upon the tit of technological society and without its comforts, they would not even be able lift a hoe to plant food.

The "fun" and "fearless" world is going to be replaced by a world of frugility and fear. And in such a world, Hillary Clinton will not be a role model. These sort of people will be swept away by the tide of the economic-environmental breakdown of modernity.

Headlines across the world were made by two Australian medical academics who said in the Medical Journal of Australia that there should be a "baby levy" in the form of a tax on babies to save the planet. These academics do not carry their thought through to it's logical conclusion. If babies increase the use of resources, what about migrants, the greatest source of population increase in Australia? Of course, it is not politically correct to say that because immigration is the West's sacred cow.

An article in the Daily Mail (21.11.07) tells the tale of a woman who was sterilised to "protect the planet". She believes that having children is selfish. But she has a much nicer life style, barren, going away on weekend trips, as well as a holiday to that Mecca for the left, South Africa. This use of carbon is justified, she believes, as she is vegan and reducing her carbon footprint by combating over-population. No sweetheart, I am afraid that it is not enough. You are still using too many resources relative to Africans. Only by stopping living can you greenies really help save the planet! Could the left and greenies show us the lead in this! In the end, Darwin and natural selection will have it's day.

Enlivened by the victory of ear wax eating PM Kev Rudd, the left are asserting themselves. Apparently they are and have been petitioning The Australian for the dismissal of journalist Janet Albrechtsen. Now I like Janet. She is a nice smart good-looking girl with the right source of conservative values - and she is also a target of the left. You see, the left hates free speech because their black hearts are fundamentally totalitarian. Look what they did in the late 90's at the Hanson rallies. Yes, they are still out there, growing stronger by the day. Smug and arrogant, thinking that they hold the high moral ground. So for a first step, support Janet by sending an email or letter to The Australian.

The UN declares it cannot afford to feed the world, in that case the UN should tell the third world, do not have the extra 2.5 billion children by 2050 we cannot feed them.

Kev Rudd speaks Mandarin and wants us to all to, that is if we are to have a job in the new China-dominated Australia. I already feel ill every time I look at him, dreading a return to the Asia cringing days of Keating. Kev Rudd will be the first Chinese prime minister of Australia – and Keating or Whitlam could live to be president of Australia, or as it will no doubt be renamed “Asia,asia,asia”.

The story headline is “Ideology Rules the Classroom”. (The Australian, May 23 2007, p.1) and it says what we have always known about our corrupt and wicked education system. Submissions to the Senate inquiry on the academic standards of school education have said that Australian education is based upon ideology rather than science. “Educators” – if they can be called that – rely upon their own opinions regardless of whether there is any evidence to back these beliefs up. That in a nutshell also sums up the plight of the modern university. As I see it, academic dung beetles, play with their own balls of intellectual excreta without ever realizing what they actually are. They think that their shit is really pearls of wisdom.

One in eight Australian kids – that’s 230,000 of the poor dears – lives with a binge drinker or a drug-taker. That’s according to a report Drug Use in the Family: Impacts and Implications for Children. Over 40,000 kids live in a house where an adult used cannabis daily and over 14,000 kids live in a house where crystal methamphetamine (ice) is used. The report was released on May 21 2007 by the Australian National Council on Drugs. The kids of course will be the next generation of drug users, carrying on the cycle of abuse, poverty, mental illness and criminality. Further evidence of the decline and ultimate fall of the West. The disease is within the body-social, and the sick animal of the West is ready to collapse.

No, genuine debate is not permitted in a liberal society. Debate implies the possibility of one side being wrong, of difference and discrimination. Liberalism call out of bounds vast geographies of debate – religion, race, Jews, the Holocaust, etc etc. – as beyond the pale. There is no tolerance of intellectuals for the sheer joy of truth seeking sceptically testing knowledge claims. These heretics are punished by the traitorous, parasitic new class intellectuals by unemployment or by use of race hate laws and the like to imprison them. Most of these vile new class toads are atheists, but their anti-rationalism far exceeds that of the Church in its Inquisitional fury. At least the Inquisition has an over-reaching point in protecting society from a perceived threat (rightly or wrongly). Our intellectuals actively work for the demise of our race and nation. And they do it on our taxes.

Yes, this is all done, paid for out of the tax dollars of hard working people. Go through the grant and fellowship funding of politically correct projects of the Australian grant funding bodies, and weep. Academics, many of whom obtain grants – and thus are in a legal conflict of interests – run this show. Sure there needs to be final Ministerial approval but that is usually a rubber stamp. The fat old boys with a hunger for sugar have the keys to the lolly cupboard. Is it any wonder that Australian academia is such an eroded landscape.

A national survey has found that 57% of Australian men cannot last more than 2 minutes! About this we are supposed to be eternally ashamed because according to feminist ideology, men must “satisfy” women, with long sensitive love making and all that gush. I say – and I have had partners complaining about cumming too fast after even I hour of back breaking grind – that 2 minutes is by far too long! From an evolutionary perspective slow cumming men would have been more likely to have got eaten by a wild animal. Our fast cumming Aussies are just battle ready. Let up hope so!

John Howard was a big Asian immigration man. During his era Asian immigration was at its highest – up to 70+ per cent. Howard diverted attention from the Asian immigration issue, first by de-emphasing multiculturalism and second by appearing to get hard with illegals. The dopey conservatives went to sleep thinking that something was being done about immigration. It sure was.

With the Howard era ending and the new age of Mandarin speaking Kevin Rudd beginning, the multicultural propaganda of the Keating era is beginning again. Thus we have Irish-Australian writing Tom Keneally (The Australian Literary Review February 7 2007) defending Muslim migrants to Australia with this argument: Anglo Saxons were wrong about the Italians and Greeks of the 1940s, Hanson was wrong about Australia being swamped by Asian, so critics of African and Muslim immigration are also wrong. In fact Keneally’s premises can all be challenged. From the perspective of the Anglo Saxon gene pool, all such immigration has been a force suppressing the Anglo gene pool – according to Satter’s genetic theory discussed at this site (link to Herewards article). An editorial in The Advertiser “the Changing Face of our Nation” essentially admits this: “Australia has been transformed from a largely Anglo-Saxon nation…to become a harmonious amalgam of people from 200 countries”. First how could this racial and genetic suicide be good for Anglo-Saxons?

This editorial waxes lyric about African migrants. And yet consider the tale of the headlines: “Police Say Sudanese a Gang Threat”, The Australian, January 5 2007, p.4; “Warlords Inspiring Refugees”, The Australian, December 27, 2007, p.5; “Taxi Sex Alert on Migrants”, The Advertiser January 25 2007, p.9; “Warning on African Refugee Gangs”, The Australian, December 26,2006, p.5. So much for “harmonious”. The editor of The Advertiser is in multicultural dreamland. Has he consulted the Aborigines about what they think about the new migration?

There is a large amount of material on the web about British people leaving Britain. I would use the word “fleeing”. The situation is very similar to that of South Africa, with a large increase in the coloured populations of Britain pushing it in the South Africa directions, and vast increases in the crime rate of both countries. The BBC News of December 11 2006 puts the figure of the number of British citizens living overseas as one in 10 or 5.5 million British-born people. Their places have been filled by largely coloured migrants, continuing the cycle of white fright and white flight.

Don’t blink, it’s already there. Muslim Sharia law is already in Britain according to the Daily Express on April 30 2007. Most major towns and cities in Britain have Islamic Law enabling Muslims to sidestep the British legal system. The British government has allowed the rule of law to be eroded in the name of political correctness. The secretive courts are often registered as charities so that they can receive British tax benefits. Talk about digging one’s own cultural grave.

Times On Line, April 18 2007, reports that British Immigration Minister, Liam Byrne, has said that large-scale immigration has “damaged the poorest communities and deeply unsettled the country”. Inequality and child poverty has resulted. There was a net migration of 185,000 in 2005 (which does not include illegals) which is four times the level when Labour came to power in 1997. The situation in Britain is so bad, according to social policy think tank Civitas, that immigration could threaten Britain’s status as a country. Britain will soon cease to be a single nation and will become a “nation of immigrants”, as a prelude to political disintegration. It is already happening, in Australia as well.

A US immigration reform bill will allow 12 million illegal immigrants to remain in the US and become US citizens. The exchange will be to build a vast wall along the US/Mexican border. This though is all b.s. Any such “wall” will have vast gate-holes in it and the security of the wall will not be enforced. US industry likes cheap Hispanic labour and like capitalism everywhere, cares nothing about national survival. All that counts for Western capitalism is short-term profits, profits, PROFITS! If the nation dies tomorrow, the rootless cosmopolitans move to the next social body. What a f’ing system. It’s hard to think of a system – even communism (the other side of the same centralist coin) – better suited for racial and national suicide than globalised capitalism.

According to legal writer Ysaiah Ross, drugs are a “growing problem among lawyers” (The Australian, May 18 2007, p.24). The article by Ross has a photo of a “prominent Melbourne QC” who is in a critical condition in hospital. Police in Adelaide found him “naked and unconscious” and “are expected to charge a young woman with administering a drug of dependence to him”. Hard drug use among lawyers, including top lawyers is common another prominent QC says.

Ross suggests random drug testing for lawyers. How about mandatory tests of all lawyers and judges with dismissal for positive drug tests? Let’s do the same for academics and politicians. That should prove interesting.

The once White West is committing racial suicide. According to Jacques Chirac, the roots of Europe are “Muslim as much as Christian”. US Secretary of State and “man of colour” Colin Powell wants a massive increase in the US Muslim population. George Bush is an open-borders president that welcomes all of Mexico to re-colonise the US. Consequently the white percentage of the US population has declined from 89% in 1965 to 67% in 2007, with a non-white population of over 100 million. In the name of “anti-racism” the White West is destroying itself.

This situation is a reductio ad absurdum – a reduction to absurdity of the core philosophical belief behind immigration and multiculturalism. Race does matter, and our race does matter. It is not the historical job of white Aryan people to “save the world”. Our moral obligations exist only to our own kind. To hell with “tolerance”, “non-discrimination” and “diversity”. Our coloured conquerors will not be putting epitaphs of love on our tombstones.

There are various books available by feminists and ageing male professors looking forward to the end of manhood, allegedly through the “disintegration” of the Y chromosome. A leftist (male) academic put it to me that the world would be a better place without men. I suggested that he should be the first to commit suicide.

Generation Y feminist writer Emma Tom (The Australian May 23 2007, p.13) has knocked this trendoid thesis on its dopey head. If women ruled the world it would be in much the same mess that it now is; it would not be a better place. She rightly points out, and gives vivid examples of womanhood’s contribution to terrorism and sex crimes, that the “harsh truth is that they can be as devious, vindictive and violent as the next man”. She doesn’t talk about women in business or academia, but one should. Fat leftist monsters freely and openly discriminate against Anglo Saxon males, especially conservative and right wing males. A case can be made that a world run by women would be very much worse than a world run by males.