Scipio

Britain’s first black Archbishop, the Archbishop of York, John Sentamu, has urged English people to reclaim their national identity. He said : “Multiculturalism has seemed to imply, wrongly for me, let other cultures be allowed to express themselves but do not let the majority culture at all tell us its glories, its struggles, its joys, its pains”. The good black Archbishop is of course right about that. English people have been the No. 1 targets of the “new world order” elites who do not want an ethnic group whose brilliance created the modern world, to remain intact. Hence the “dirty war” which has been conducted since early in the twentieth century to deracinate and ultimately, to exterminate, the English. The Irish can have their so-called Celtic culture but the English are not permitted to exist as an ethnic unit.

Saving economies, industry etc, is important, but over history, economies and nations come and go. But if the race perishes, then all is truly lost for our heritage and destiny is gone. Today there is only one real question and that is survival of race (= “people”). Our question is Hamlet’s question: to be or not to be.

The online magazine New Matilda is sponsoring a campaign for a bill of rights act in Australia. Already a draft bill is circulating, drafted by Latrobe University law professor Spencer Zifcak. This draft codifies a whole range of international human rights treaties, putting into one concentrated package every politically correct ideal of the new class. Bills of rights, with such vague and lofty ideals are the perfect tools of the lawyer class who will create another industry for themselves in interpreting the “sacred texts’. Such a bill will subtract from our freedoms, not augment.

Howard and Ruddock, despite a concentrated attack by Australia’s media, have held firm on the new sedition laws. The laws are framed so wide as to catch, as John North, president of the Law Council of Australia has said, “members of the media as well as legitimate protesters and even peace activists.” Under such laws, many of Australia’s most famous artists – such as S.T. Gill, Sidney Nolan and Albert Tucker – would have been prosecuted for sedition if these laws were in place in their time. Advocating or encouraging “seditious intention” – which includes urging dissatisfaction with the government, the constitution and either house of parliament” – would seem to be the proper role of an intellectual and social critic, because there really could be objective grounds for “dissatisfaction” with these institutions. Philosophers from Socrates and Plato onwards have told us as much. It seems that seekers of the truth will have to grin and bear it. The price of silence is eternal cowardice.