Scipio

John Howard was a big Asian immigration man. During his era Asian immigration was at its highest – up to 70+ per cent. Howard diverted attention from the Asian immigration issue, first by de-emphasing multiculturalism and second by appearing to get hard with illegals. The dopey conservatives went to sleep thinking that something was being done about immigration. It sure was.

With the Howard era ending and the new age of Mandarin speaking Kevin Rudd beginning, the multicultural propaganda of the Keating era is beginning again. Thus we have Irish-Australian writing Tom Keneally (The Australian Literary Review February 7 2007) defending Muslim migrants to Australia with this argument: Anglo Saxons were wrong about the Italians and Greeks of the 1940s, Hanson was wrong about Australia being swamped by Asian, so critics of African and Muslim immigration are also wrong. In fact Keneally’s premises can all be challenged. From the perspective of the Anglo Saxon gene pool, all such immigration has been a force suppressing the Anglo gene pool – according to Satter’s genetic theory discussed at this site (link to Herewards article). An editorial in The Advertiser “the Changing Face of our Nation” essentially admits this: “Australia has been transformed from a largely Anglo-Saxon nation…to become a harmonious amalgam of people from 200 countries”. First how could this racial and genetic suicide be good for Anglo-Saxons?

This editorial waxes lyric about African migrants. And yet consider the tale of the headlines: “Police Say Sudanese a Gang Threat”, The Australian, January 5 2007, p.4; “Warlords Inspiring Refugees”, The Australian, December 27, 2007, p.5; “Taxi Sex Alert on Migrants”, The Advertiser January 25 2007, p.9; “Warning on African Refugee Gangs”, The Australian, December 26,2006, p.5. So much for “harmonious”. The editor of The Advertiser is in multicultural dreamland. Has he consulted the Aborigines about what they think about the new migration?