Thursday, June 14, 2007
Asia Mad Kev Rudd, PM.
Our Corrupt Classrooms
Living with “the Piss”
Is Debate Possible in a Liberal Society? No!
No, genuine debate is not permitted in a liberal society. Debate implies the possibility of one side being wrong, of difference and discrimination. Liberalism call out of bounds vast geographies of debate – religion, race, Jews, the Holocaust, etc etc. – as beyond the pale. There is no tolerance of intellectuals for the sheer joy of truth seeking sceptically testing knowledge claims. These heretics are punished by the traitorous, parasitic new class intellectuals by unemployment or by use of race hate laws and the like to imprison them. Most of these vile new class toads are atheists, but their anti-rationalism far exceeds that of the Church in its Inquisitional fury. At least the Inquisition has an over-reaching point in protecting society from a perceived threat (rightly or wrongly). Our intellectuals actively work for the demise of our race and nation. And they do it on our taxes.
Yes, this is all done, paid for out of the tax dollars of hard working people. Go through the grant and fellowship funding of politically correct projects of the Australian grant funding bodies, and weep. Academics, many of whom obtain grants – and thus are in a legal conflict of interests – run this show. Sure there needs to be final Ministerial approval but that is usually a rubber stamp. The fat old boys with a hunger for sugar have the keys to the lolly cupboard. Is it any wonder that Australian academia is such an eroded landscape.
Premature Ejaculation – Bah! Humbug!
After Howard – The Return of the Multiculturalists
John Howard was a big Asian immigration man. During his era Asian immigration was at its highest – up to 70+ per cent. Howard diverted attention from the Asian immigration issue, first by de-emphasing multiculturalism and second by appearing to get hard with illegals. The dopey conservatives went to sleep thinking that something was being done about immigration. It sure was.
With the Howard era ending and the new age of Mandarin speaking Kevin Rudd beginning, the multicultural propaganda of the Keating era is beginning again. Thus we have Irish-Australian writing Tom Keneally (The Australian Literary Review February 7 2007) defending Muslim migrants to Australia with this argument: Anglo Saxons were wrong about the Italians and Greeks of the 1940s, Hanson was wrong about Australia being swamped by Asian, so critics of African and Muslim immigration are also wrong. In fact Keneally’s premises can all be challenged. From the perspective of the Anglo Saxon gene pool, all such immigration has been a force suppressing the Anglo gene pool – according to Satter’s genetic theory discussed at this site (link to Herewards article). An editorial in The Advertiser “the Changing Face of our Nation” essentially admits this: “Australia has been transformed from a largely Anglo-Saxon nation…to become a harmonious amalgam of people from 200 countries”. First how could this racial and genetic suicide be good for Anglo-Saxons?
This editorial waxes lyric about African migrants. And yet consider the tale of the headlines: “Police Say Sudanese a Gang Threat”, The Australian, January 5 2007, p.4; “Warlords Inspiring Refugees”, The Australian, December 27, 2007, p.5; “Taxi Sex Alert on Migrants”, The Advertiser January 25 2007, p.9; “Warning on African Refugee Gangs”, The Australian, December 26,2006, p.5. So much for “harmonious”. The editor of The Advertiser is in multicultural dreamland. Has he consulted the Aborigines about what they think about the new migration?
White Fright, White Flight
Sharia Law in Britain
Too Late for Britain
A Wall With Holes
Drugged Lawyers
According to legal writer Ysaiah Ross, drugs are a “growing problem among lawyers” (The Australian, May 18 2007, p.24). The article by Ross has a photo of a “prominent Melbourne QC” who is in a critical condition in hospital. Police in Adelaide found him “naked and unconscious” and “are expected to charge a young woman with administering a drug of dependence to him”. Hard drug use among lawyers, including top lawyers is common another prominent QC says.
Ross suggests random drug testing for lawyers. How about mandatory tests of all lawyers and judges with dismissal for positive drug tests? Let’s do the same for academics and politicians. That should prove interesting.
The Suicide of the West: ll
The once White West is committing racial suicide. According to Jacques Chirac, the roots of Europe are “Muslim as much as Christian”. US Secretary of State and “man of colour” Colin Powell wants a massive increase in the US Muslim population. George Bush is an open-borders president that welcomes all of Mexico to re-colonise the US. Consequently the white percentage of the US population has declined from 89% in 1965 to 67% in 2007, with a non-white population of over 100 million. In the name of “anti-racism” the White West is destroying itself.
This situation is a reductio ad absurdum – a reduction to absurdity of the core philosophical belief behind immigration and multiculturalism. Race does matter, and our race does matter. It is not the historical job of white Aryan people to “save the world”. Our moral obligations exist only to our own kind. To hell with “tolerance”, “non-discrimination” and “diversity”. Our coloured conquerors will not be putting epitaphs of love on our tombstones.
The Truth about Women
There are various books available by feminists and ageing male professors looking forward to the end of manhood, allegedly through the “disintegration” of the Y chromosome. A leftist (male) academic put it to me that the world would be a better place without men. I suggested that he should be the first to commit suicide.
Generation Y feminist writer Emma Tom (The Australian May 23 2007, p.13) has knocked this trendoid thesis on its dopey head. If women ruled the world it would be in much the same mess that it now is; it would not be a better place. She rightly points out, and gives vivid examples of womanhood’s contribution to terrorism and sex crimes, that the “harsh truth is that they can be as devious, vindictive and violent as the next man”. She doesn’t talk about women in business or academia, but one should. Fat leftist monsters freely and openly discriminate against Anglo Saxon males, especially conservative and right wing males. A case can be made that a world run by women would be very much worse than a world run by males.
